Introduction To Chippewas Thames Nation Regarding EIIR Canada Ship Supreme Court Enbridge Decisison

JUL 28TH    SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST    2017 ADE
SCC CHIPPEWAS THAMES DECISION Vs SCC NUNAVUT DECISION
FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT
GREETINGS TO
*** CONSECUTIVELY SETTLED SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF CHIPPEWAS THAMES NATION ***
In This Matter Of
Chippewas Thames Vs Enbridge
SCC DECISION IN CASE DOCKET 36776    : ISSUES OF CONSENT Vs CONSULT

Regarding
Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia & Bastien Estate v Canada
*** INTEGRITY BEYOND FICTION ***
At this time, when EIIR Canada Ship is celebrating the claim of 150 years of confederation, one is left to wonder - when considering these two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions (Nunavut & Chippewas Thames) - whether or not the Supreme Court of Canada has confused "consult" with "consent" when considering the continued political paramount rights of Chippewas Thames consecutively settled sovereign indigenous Peoples (CSSP) ... "consent" does not appear in the decision; versus "consult" being the dominant reference throughout the published decision.
The 1613 Haudenosaunee Peoples Trade Treaty Agreement with the Empire of the Netherlands continues as the United Nations recognized oldest, continuous nation-to-nation trade agreement in the world; preceding the failed Hudson's Bay Company Charter of 1670 (expired in 1697). And, this compounds the confusion prevailing in Turtle Island North of the 49th parallel in these political matters of claimed governing paramountcy between the Canoe CSSPs Vs EIIR Canada Ship. As with Kelly Leitch, there is a calling out for integrity here.

In 2009, the Hul'qumi'num' Treaty Group (HTG) Vs Canada land title dispute was submitted to the IACHR (Inter American Commission On Human Rights). And, therein, were supportive to HTG amicus curiae submissions by Canada Lawyers Rights Watch and Amnesty International. This case has continued beyond Canada's protest that HTG had not completed it "internal remedies" before advancing to the IACHR. The amicus curiae submissions highlighted the history of Canada's government ignoring its SCC decisions when they favoured CSSP paramount land title claims. Two million acres of land title is under consideration.
Also, of interest here are the continued paramount governing claims as advanced by the Kelly Lake Rocky Mountain Cree Nation - who asserts that they continue since the beginning of time to be consecutively settled sovereign Peoples (CSSP) within the absolute monarchical governing framework.

Hence, one does wonder - in view of historical reports from the U.K. parliament that there is no prevailing Hudson's Bay Company Charter since 1697 (and, further, that the Charles II Royal decrees of the HBC Charter and the gift of lnd to Prince Rupert were ultra vires in absence of parliamentary "consent") - how does EIIR Canada Ship rightfully assert a claim to paramount governance of the said Turtle Island North of the 49th parallel territories in absence of original right (Charles II specifically prohibited HBC from acquiring any lands; only entitled under the Charter to enter into trade agreements - including those captured by Rome's inter caetera and romanus pontifex 15th century Papal Bulls). Hence, the sale of lands by HBC to the founding Canada group would appear to be null and void as originating out of failed Charter capacity.

Thus, in summary, it is a remaining question in this friendly submission to Chippewas Thames Nation if you have a considered opinion regarding your "consecutively settled sovereign Peoples" status - one that would assert dominance over EIIR Canada Ship (who has entered your territory within the Two Row Wampum / Peace Trust Friendship / Gus Wen Tah Covenant Chain protocols, which are conditional landing rights that include your option to veto the mutual interests agreement with EIIR Canada Ship for just &/or good cause) ?
Addendum Question
Does Chippewas Thames Nation collect taxes from EIIR Canada Ship under the Two Row Wampum Protocol ?
RELEVANT REFERENCES
Backgrounder
including, but not limited to
TAXOSNET AUCTION

 Huy'ch'qu' / thank you / merci / miiqwich. Your replies are invited to our international offices : attention to this published author (Ralph C Goodwin / SQYX) via email.
THE "JUSTIFIED" WAR DOCTRINE & THE "JUST SOCIETY" PRINCIPLE


THE FINAL 1TH HOUR
13 INDIGENOUS GRANDMOTHERS : VIDEO
FOR THE NEXT 7 GENERATIONS from Biggest Ideas on Vimeo.
POLITICAL COMMENTARIES PUBLISHED BY
Shqwi'qwal   RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN   Yuxwuletun
CV2016 & ADDRESS
1.250.709.1809
KWA'MUTSUN NATION STATE : HRH STITUMATATULWUTH HWUNEEM : PH TRUST
HRH KITCHI-OSTEW-KANEEKANAGOSHICK-OKIMOW-WACON KANEEKANEET CSSP
ROCKY MOUNTAIN KELLY LAKE CREE NATION STATE STATEMENT OF WEALTH
CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY : BAGEHOT LECTURES : ENGLAND
I.  INTRODUCTION TO THE SECOND EDITION.
II.  THE CABINET.
III.  THE MONARCHY.
IV.  THE HOUSE OF LORDS.
V.  THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.
VI.  ON CHANGES OF MINISTRY.
VII.  ITS SUPPOSED CHECKS AND BALANCES.
VIII.  THE PREREQUISITES OF CABINET GOVERNMENT, AND THE PECULIAR FORM WHICH THEY HAVE ASSUMED IN ENGLAND.
IX.  ITS HISTORY, AND THE EFFECTS OF THAT HISTORY.—CONCLUSION.
Global Free Prior  AMBASSADOR : FPIC : TERMS GUIDE  Informed Consent
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ALLODIUM REAL ESTATE REGISTRY
 
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)